OK, this is just a personal rant, I know, but pah-leeeeze people, what is the deal with folks listing bullets as "unlisted"? Unlisted in what?...the "bullet bible"? Or is it truly not listed in any reference work available? Or are those writing the descriptions too cheap or lazy to buy/read the materials that are available? Or, as I suspect, does using "unlisted" in the description make the specimen more valuable/desirable and hence worthy of the inflated price attached to it? As far as the excuse "it doesn't measure exactly the same" as an illustrated specimen; how much difference in dimension does qualify as "a different bullet"? Personally, I'm not convinced that some really even know how to measure bullets accurately. Other bullet specimens may be intentionally unlisted because they are not of the American Civil War period or were not used in this country. OK, I feel better now...... I'll go take my meds............
