When that thing was discussed in another forum a couple of years ago, I tore the owner's claims about it apart, in relentless detail. Apparently, either nobody ever sent him the info, or he disregarded it.
I didn't send the info to him myself, because I've learned the hard way that some Dealers take mortal offense (and hold a grudge for years) when given corrective education about an ...ummm ..."misidentified" relic they own. (Y'all know who they are.)
Seeing it has now been posted in this forum, let's have some Educational fun with it. Who here can tell us the largest number of reasons the shell is not what its owner claims it is?
Sorry, Scott and Mike, but you are excluded from the game, because you saw my detailed comments about it at the other forum. ;-)
Regards,
Pete