Bullet and Shell Civil War Projectiles Forum

Relic Discussion => Artillery => Topic started by: emike123 on February 09, 2013, 01:33:49 PM

Title: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: emike123 on February 09, 2013, 01:33:49 PM
This little puppy followed me home from Dalton.

(http://i1236.photobucket.com/albums/ff458/emike123/DSCN1602_zpsaf1d53aa.jpg)

(http://i1236.photobucket.com/albums/ff458/emike123/DSCN1603_zps0c5428d0.jpg)

(http://i1236.photobucket.com/albums/ff458/emike123/DSCN1604_zps4c4b5764.jpg)

This same spar torpedo fuse is pictured and discussed in Volume 33 #6 of North South Trader.  For more information on them, refer to pages 134 and 135 of Jones' fuse book
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: PIA on February 09, 2013, 02:30:18 PM
Nice!
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: 6lbgun on February 09, 2013, 03:37:14 PM
Fantastic fuze Mike.  Pretty good photography too.
Dan
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: John D. Bartleson Jr. on February 09, 2013, 04:42:34 PM
Fantastic find Mike. you are so fortunate. Even tho you will eat only beans and franks for six months to pay for it.
John 8)
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: joevann on February 09, 2013, 07:30:14 PM
Sure is shiny solder!
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: Selma Brooke Gunner on February 09, 2013, 07:53:41 PM
An awesomely nice piece there.
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: joevann on February 09, 2013, 08:19:25 PM
Does Figure 4 look familiar?  From "Submarine Warfare-Offensive & Defensive"  by Lt. CDR J.S. Barnes U.S.N.  New York: D. Van Nostrand, 1869.
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: joevann on February 09, 2013, 08:34:45 PM
Here's the accompnying text.
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: emike123 on February 09, 2013, 10:38:52 PM
As one of the above posts only comment on this fuse, it does have shiny solder.  Thats because it was capped and in the bottom of a soldiers trunk for 145+ years.  The North South Trader article is worth reading to learn more about the trove of one of the first Civil War relic collectors who brought it home along with some other fantastic things.  The note was with it as well, but I did not take it out of its protective sleeve to photograph
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: joevann on February 09, 2013, 11:16:43 PM
Wasn't questioning the authenticity.  It's obviously the real deal.  Just marveling at the condition.
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: Lowcountry83 on February 09, 2013, 11:59:03 PM
Mike what is it with you and all these common fuses? You should really try to add some rare and valuable items to your collection ;)

Stephen
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: John D. Bartleson Jr. on February 10, 2013, 09:41:31 AM
Mike,
    If I may add to your illustrous fuze to illustrate how it was employed.  Probably used in other applications with minor modifications.  As you can see in the fuze drawing inset mine has a slightly different construction.
    In a famous quote "Damn the Torpedoes" these were actually floating mines, however this below "spar torpedo" was driven at the enemy by a vessel.
Regards,
John
This plate was featured earlier but I couldn't find it.
(http://i1069.photobucket.com/albums/u465/jbart2/sparTorpedowithFuze_zpscbf2b7de.jpg)
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: emike123 on February 10, 2013, 11:56:34 AM
Thats it, John.  My Dad mailed me this article last week about one rather famous spar torpedo.

http://news.yahoo.com/experts-evidence-submarine-mystery-203606783.html
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: John D. Bartleson Jr. on February 10, 2013, 02:41:50 PM
Mike,
  I had read the article a few days ago and 'dugh' it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that being only about 20 feet away from X pounds of powder detonating is going make ears and eyes bleed but probably opened up some metal joint seams and allowed water to leak in.
Anyone know the explosive weight?
John
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: divedigger on February 10, 2013, 07:15:34 PM
yes, water does not compress, so the shock is transferrred right to the sub
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: emike123 on February 10, 2013, 07:56:41 PM
Went to the Piggly Wiggly today and saw this spooky clown balloon.  JBB, are you moonlighting on us?

Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: John D. Bartleson Jr. on February 10, 2013, 09:00:06 PM
Yep, the hollow submarine cylinder actually draws part of the explosion to it because it has a lesser p.s.i. inside.  The other part of the explosion goes right through the target ship's hull.
Regards,
John
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: joevann on February 10, 2013, 09:48:04 PM
I thought I saw some research that showed that the Hunley had been hit by small arms fire that shattered the cast iron flange of the viewing port causing it to take on water, but theories are theories.  Everyone who knows the truth died at their stations.
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: scottfromgeorgia on February 11, 2013, 03:10:14 AM
But wouldn't the blast be a directed blast? It is hard to believe that the torpedo was designed to send an equal shock in all directions. 
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: John D. Bartleson Jr. on February 11, 2013, 09:09:57 AM
But shock waves do go in all directions with the majority leading towards a lessor p.s.i.  Does anyone know the amount of black powder in the torpedo?  I would certainly not want to be 20 feet from an underwater detonation.
Regards,
John
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: John D. Bartleson Jr. on February 11, 2013, 09:12:01 AM
However, I should think with my last posting by eMike I would lose all credibility. :)
John
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: scottfromgeorgia on February 11, 2013, 10:17:44 AM
Being in Baghdad right now, we are anxious about directed or shaped charges. These are charges that blast most of the energy in one direction. Although the technology for shaped charges might not have existed in ACW, they certainly know how to shape projectiles to direct energy in certain directions. Wouldn't they have done the same to the torpedo?
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: John D. Bartleson Jr. on February 11, 2013, 11:46:57 AM
No,  black powder would make a poor shaped charge. Have you seen other applications of the Monroe Effect in ACW ordnance?
Besides the spar torpedo fuzing does not permit base detonation of the charge.?? a necessary element for shaped charges.
    Charles Edward Munroe didn't discover the effect until 1886.  Don't compare the base detonating, nose ejection of shrapnel to the shaped charge as they are two distinct types of projectiles.
John
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: Selma Brooke Gunner on February 12, 2013, 01:18:34 PM
     Ok, been doing some research on the question of how much powder was in the spar torpedo. I can not find anything definate but the common idea is that there was between 90 to 135 pounds of black powder in the torpedo. The over pressure alone from a explosion of that weight being that close to the boat could have caused some of the plates to spring enough to allow water to enter. Another consideration is the effects of the explosion on the men in the boat, could it have rendered them unconscious? I think possibly so.
     As noted in the article on the Hunley the spar was not detactable as first believed, so the boat was not able to plant the torpedo then back away to explode it. I am sure that in the future we will get the skinny on what happened but at the moment it is all speculative.
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: jonpatterson on February 12, 2013, 03:26:06 PM
Hey Mike,

Is it true you have made an offer to buy the Hunley to add to your collection also? It would seem to be the appropriate addition to go with the spar torpedo fuse.   :)
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: emike123 on February 13, 2013, 02:05:35 PM
Nah, Jon.  Looking instead to get a free CS sub out of the drink in Wilmington or Mobile!

http://www.civilwarwiki.net/wiki/CSS_Pioneer_II
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: divedigger on February 13, 2013, 05:54:32 PM
huh? Wilmington? is that what you keep asking me about?
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: Dave the plumber on February 13, 2013, 08:32:22 PM
    DiverDiggerDave,              It's off Eagle's Island buried in the mud. It was under construction when Wilmington fell, almost complete. Fonville told me about it, he has the info......
Title: Re: "Spar"ring partner
Post by: emike123 on February 17, 2013, 11:40:29 AM
Today is Sunday, February 17, 2013

Today in U.S. Civil War History:

1864 - The Hunley sailed from Charleston Harbor and torpedoed the U.S.S. Housatanic. The Hunley became the first submarine to sink a ship in battle, but the Hunley herself sank before she returned to Charleston.